Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Sophia Coppola, I hate you

June 11th 2010 02:44
I just watched Marie Antoinette. It was so terrible I thought that I would official abandon this column.

Instead, I just decided to make this column less intellectual and more ranting.

Marie Antoinette was terribly boring. Granted, I'm not a thirteen year old girl (who I think would in fact love this movie). It was just shot after shot of pretty colors and furniture and cakes and shoes. I'd almost go so far as to say it was masturbatory. That Ms. Coppola was just like oooh that's pretty, let's put that in there and make it part of a 10 minute montage of random stuff. The movie was all shiny with no substance. The plot was historically inaccurate, disjointed and boring.

Even though I liked Lost in Translation and The Virgin Suicide (I wonder if I watched them now if I still would?), I've always had a grudge against Coppola for her role in The Godfather Part III. I know she probably has to hear about that shit a lot. But The Godfather I and II is/are my favorite movie(s), so I have to bring it up.

I also have mixed feelings on Mr. Jason Schwartzman. I think he always plays characters I don't like and as a result I actual start to dislike him. I think the only thing I enjoyed watching him in was I Heart Huckabees. Like okay, we get that you're the different-kind-of-good-looking guy who's got a chip on his shoulder, but enough all ready.

I recently watched Shop Girl with Schwartzman, Claire Danes and Steve Martin (who was phenomenal), so hopefully I'll give you a real review on that one. Til then...

97
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
2 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Deni

June 11th 2010 03:42
Roger Ebert gives brilliant insight into this movie. The points you make about never ending shots of pretty things actually plays along with the story that Coppola is trying to tell.

Roger Ebert has this to say:
3. No, the picture is not informative and detailed about the actual politics of the period. That is because we are entirely within Marie's world. And it is contained within Versailles, which shuts out all external reality. It is a self-governing architectural island, like Kane's Xanadu, that shuts out politics, reality, poverty, society.

You should read the rest of his review here: Roger Ebert's Review of Marie Antoinette





Comment by Anonymous

June 14th 2010 07:59
Sophia's movies are actually good. If you just look at what's on the surface, you're bound to miss the underlying message. Maria Antionette actually deserves a lot more credit than what people give it. But too each his own.

Kudos to Roger Ebert's film review.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
55 Posts dating from February 2007
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

heather van de mark's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by heather van de mark
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]